A few months back I bought an e-reader. An IRex (DR800S) to be specific. This is my second e-reader, to be even more specific, because the Sony (PRS600) that I used before had an unfortunate accident. Although I occasionally use the e-reader to read books (not too often, though, I promised myself that I would not let it stand in the way of having pretentiously well-stocked bookshelves), my main use for it is to read academic papers. I thought my experiences might be of some use to anyone who is thinking of buying an e-reader for the same purpose.
Initially, I wanted to buy an e-reader with a small display, which are considerably cheaper than the large ones, and just scroll through the pdfs like you would on a regular computer. Luckily I didn't, because e-readers are way to sluggish to comfortably scroll through a document. This is because e-ink displays have a very low refresh rate (i.e., it takes quite some time for the image to change). Most e-readers have the option to reformat (reflow) text, which means that the reader tries to increase the font size while maintaining a reasonable layout. For books, which tend to have a fairly straightforward layout, this works fine, but for multicolumn .pdfs (i.e., most academic papers) the results are disastrous. So basically, if you want to read academic papers, you will want an e-reader with a sizable display. The IRex has an 8 inch display, which is just large enough …

The “problem” that I'm referring to is that with every eye movement, the retinal image of the world changes enormously. Therefore, if we were to take changes in the retinal image as evidence for changes in the world around us, we would perceive a dizzyingly unstable world. Which, clearly, we don't. We may be vaguely aware of the fact that we make eye movements, but subjectively it does not feel as though eye movements interfere with our sense of “visual stability”. Apparently, the visual system somehow compensates very effectively for eye movements.